State News
Craddick presses bills; House takes up finance system overhaul Tuesday
10:45 PM CST on Monday, March 7, 2005
AUSTIN — House Speaker Tom Craddick put on a full-court press Monday to
secure enough votes to pass a massive school finance overhaul and
property tax cut package, the most important legislation of his two
terms leading the House.
After issuing unusually personal pleas at a closed-door meeting of GOP
lawmakers Sunday night and offering extra transportation funds to entice
reluctant rural Republicans, Mr. Craddick appeared to have won the
necessary votes. House debate on the first part of the schools package
starts today.
Republicans were feeling the pressure to back the two bills.
"Speaker Craddick was stronger than horseradish," Rep. Dan Branch,
R-Dallas, said of the packed Sunday meeting. "He made a clear and
convincing case for the bill and the need to move the process forward.
This is the signature piece of legislation for the session for most of
us."
Mr. Craddick, who also met with most of the 40 House committee chairs on
Monday, was upbeat about the chances for the first bill, which changes
school-funding formulas. Asked whether he had enough votes to pass it,
he replied: "I think so. We're still working with the members, and we've
had a good response."
WHAT: The House will consider the two bills that
would overhaul Texas' school finance system. The first bill would
change the school funding formula and enact new programs and
accountability provisions; the second would increase several taxes
to fund a property tax cut.
WHEN: House leaders expect to begin debate on the
first bill today and may schedule a vote the following day. They
want to take up the tax bill Thursday.
WHAT THE BILLS DO: The school bill would increase
funding for schools $1.5 billion a year; cut maximum property taxes
by one-third; gradually scale back provisions that require wealthy
districts to share property tax revenue; create a merit-pay plan for
teachers based on student achievement; curtail districts' ability to
raise money by limiting yearly property tax increases; and enforce
new accountability provisions for districts.
The tax bill would increase and expand the sales tax; boost taxes on
motor vehicle sales; increase the cigarette tax by $1 per pack; and
replace the business franchise levy with a payroll tax.
BACKERS SAY: This bill is the best way to
fundamentally overhaul the school finance system and avoid future
court cases over funding. Every district would get a boost, and
homeowners and businesses would get relief from sky-high property
taxes.
OPPONENTS SAY: School districts and educator groups
– nearly unanimous in opposition – say the funding increase barely
keeps pace with inflation. Plus, state-required spending, such as
the merit-pay plan, would eat up much of the new money.
WHAT'S NEXT: If both bills pass the House, as
expected, the focus shifts to the Senate, where members laid out
broad goals at the start of the legislative session. Senators have
not yet taken action on specific bills.
The second part, which would cut property taxes and increase other
levies, remained short of the necessary votes, largely because of a
proposed 1.1 percent payroll tax.
Few of the House's 63 Democrats are expected to support the GOP plan,
but with 87 Republicans, the leadership could withstand a few defections.
Democratic leaders plan to offer a substitute bill, along with several
other amendments.
"We're getting almost unanimous support for our plan from
superintendents, school board members and teachers," said Rep. Jim
Dunnam of Waco, the House Democratic Caucus chairman.
The Democrats' proposal would increase teacher pay and raise overall
funding for schools by $5 billion over the next two years – $2 billion
more than the GOP plan. Democrats contend their measure would cut taxes
more for most homeowners, though businesses would pay more.
Leading business and education groups lobbied House members during the
weekend and all day Monday as the showdown on the House floor approached.
Business groups generally back the education bill, which includes
changes such as merit pay for teachers and online student testing. But
they were split over the payroll tax in the second bill.
A coalition of business leaders that includes several high-dollar GOP
contributors offered support.
"Improving education must be the No. 1 goal of any education finance
plan," said Schulenburg businessman Charles McMahen, a former bank
executive who is chairing the coalition, Texas Businesses for Education
Excellence. "More money into the system, without a specific focus on
encouraging excellence, is a bad investment that will do little to
advance our children's learning."
But school districts and education groups representing teachers,
administrators and parents continued their fight against the
legislation, saying public schools would gain little. They swamped House
members with phone calls and e-mails during the weekend.
"We regrettably must ask you to vote no on the bill when it comes up for
debate," interim Dallas Superintendent Larry Groppel wrote in a letter
to House members from the area. His arguments against the measure were
repeated by superintendents across the state.
For Mr. Craddick and the GOP leadership, the last-minute concessions to
rural Republicans may have secured victory.
Panhandle Rep. Warren Chisum said the lawmakers were "absolutely on the
fence" about the bill until its sponsor, Rep. Kent Grusendorf of
Arlington, agreed to include more than $100 million in additional
funding for school buses in their districts.
Mr. Grusendorf agreed to accept an amendment during the floor debate
this week that would distribute transportation money based on the miles
that buses travel, which can surpass 100 miles a day in some rural areas.
"It was close to a deal-breaker," said Mr. Chisum, R-Pampa, describing
how important the transportation funding was in negotiations over the
bill. "That is a big, big deal for us."
Two Republicans who were inclined to vote no on the education and
property tax cut bills – Reps. Brian McCall of Plano and Charlie Geren
of Fort Worth – said significant changes are needed to get their votes.
"We need to get real and significant buy-in from local communities," Mr.
McCall said. "This bill doesn't do that. It also doesn't deliver
long-term financial support for school districts and teachers."
Mr. Geren said he cannot support an incentive-pay program unless
teachers – especially in poorer districts – first get a pay raise. Mr.
Grusendorf's bill would not increase base teacher salaries.
Mr. Geren also objected to a provision that scales back how much money
can be taken from wealthy districts under provisions in the law.
At the Sunday evening GOP caucus meeting, said Rep. Bill Zedler of
Arlington, Mr. Craddick left no doubt how strong he felt about passing
the bill.
"Basically, [the message] was that we've been put into leadership, and
this is obviously something that has gone on a long time and is begging
for a solution," Mr. Zedler said. "And that we need to, in essence, rise
up to the challenge and get a good bill through."
Mr. Craddick had members voice "each and every concern" about the bill
at the meeting, Mr. Zedler said. "He said, 'Let's address these right
now.' "
E-mail tstutz@dallasnews.com
and
kmbrooks@dallasnews.com
More headlines
News, Photos & More
KVUE on your Desktop: Get traffic, radar and up-to-the-minute headlines on your desktop.
Keep Up: Have KVUE headlines delivered to your RSS reader.
Find out what's happening: Check our Events calendar to find events near you.
Most popular KVUE.com stories
Most E-mailed News
Popular Stories






You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name